Microfluidic cell separation and sorting: A review

Introduction to microfluidic cell sorting and separation

1. Microfluidic filters for cell separation and sorting

Microfluidic or microscale filters are simple methods for separating cells based on size or deformability as biomarkers. These techniques allow you to precisely adjust the filter pore size to the required needs [2]. However these filters face many challenges including heterogeneity of cell sizes within a population, clogging and fouling.

Schematic illustration for weir, pillar and cross-flow microfluidic filters. From Gossett et al. Anal Bioanal Chem 2010.

2. Hydrodynamic microfluidic separation and sorting technique

This technique presumes that at a low Reynolds number (as it happens in the microfluidic scale) the center of a particle will follow fluid streamlines. By partitioning the flow in a clever way (controlling flow rate through one or more inlets, channel geometry, and configuration of outlets) several methods make possible to dictate size-based cell separation and sorting [3].

Hydrodynamic methods of separation. A) Pinched flow microfluidic fractionation. From Takagi et at. Lab Chip 2005. B) Hydrodynamic microfluidic filtration. From Yamada et al. Lab Chip 2005.

3. DLD separation and sorting (Deterministic Lateral Displacement)

Deterministic lateral displacement (DLD) technique. From Inglis DW. Appl Phys Lett 2009.

Deterministic Lateral Displacement (DLD) is a size-based cell sorting technique which consists in an ordered array of obstacles (micropost array). The laminar flow together with interactions with the array, forces particles or cells into specific trajectories through the device. The displacement of cells or particles perpendicular to primary flow is determined by the pattern of the array [4].

– Particles or cells below a critical size follow streamlines through the array gaps with no net displacement from the original streamline.

– Particles above the critical size are displaced laterally to cross sequential streamlines with each row traveling at an angle predetermined by the post offset distance.

The critical particle size for fractionation depends on the gap between posts and offset of posts [5].

4. Microfluidic field-flow fractionation separation and sorting

With field-flow fractionation (FFF) techniques, a separation field (flow, electric, gravitational, centrifugal, etc.) is used to produce a force in a perpendicular direction from the primary channel flow. Inside a microfluidic device, with its characteristic parabolic velocity profile, particles that feel the greatest force are driven closest to the wall where flow velocity is lower. In contrast, particles feeling a weaker perpendicular force remain in the center where the flow velocity is faster [6]. As a result some particles are transported faster along the channel than others and are eluted before.

Field-flow fractionation microfluidic technique. From Wikipedia 2007.

5. Microfluidic microstructures: grooves, chevrons, herringbones and hydrophoresis

Certain geometries of microstructure protrusions in microfluidic channels allow size-, deformability- and density-based cell and particle separations. Protrusions geometry can perform binary separation of particles of different sizes and concentration or focusing on all particulate matter to a single stream. [7].

Example of a microfluidic microstructure mechanism for particle separation. From Choi et al. Lab Chip 2010.

6. Microfluidic inertial separation and sorting techniques

A cell size sorting Pilot Pack has been assembled based on inertial separation. This technique relies on a combination of an asymmetrical sheath flow and proper channel geometry to generate a soft inertial force on the sample fluid in the curved and focused sample flow segment to deflect larger particles away while the smaller ones are kept on or near the original flow streamline.

The working principle of this separation is to devoid of filter interfaces or external force fields, avoiding clogging and making it easy to setup. Balanced transverse force components concentrate and divert particle streams according to the designed size cutoff. This spiral flow filtration concept can address size and mass-based separation of microparticles, including biological agents [8]. This method can be applied for passive sperm sorting and selection.

Example of an inertial microfluidic technique. From Seo et al. Appl Phys Lett 2007.

7. Gravity and sedimentation microfluidic separation and sorting technique

In this cell separation and sorting technique, gravity acts perpendicular to channel flow, and particles sediment at a velocity dependent on their radius, the acceleration of gravity, the difference between the density of the particles and the density of the fluid, and the viscosity of the fluid.

Separation of particles with different radii is amplified by hydrodynamic effects: the channel of the microfluidic device gradually widens asymmetrically such that the flow near the bottom of the channel is angled downward, assisting in the migration of larger radius particles [9].

Gravitational and sedimentation microfluidic technique. From Huh et al. Anal Chem 2007.

8. Microfluidic biomimetic separation and sorting technique

In order to achieve desired fractionation of blood components, Biomimetic microfluidic separation techniques emulate hemodynamic phenomena involving the intrinsic properties of blood and the microvasculature. These phenomena have been observed and replicated in microfluidic systems and include leukocyte margination, plasma skimming, and the bifurcation law, also known as Zweifach–Fung effect.

A number of techniques have been developed to take advantage of these effects [10] [11].

Example of two microfluidic devices that mimic the microvasculature. a) Leukocyte margination is used to isolate leukocytes (*) as they are typically found in the near-wall regions of flow. From Shevkoplyas et al. Anal Chem 2005. b) Bifurcation law is manipulated to remove cell-free plasma from blood. From Yang et al. Lab Chip 2006.

9. Microfluidic magnetophoresis separation and sorting technique

Magnetophoresis separation and sorting technique is a microfluidic system which exploits the intrinsic magnetophoretic properties of blood cells for separation. For example, white blood cells are diamagnetic whereas red blood cells can be paramagnetic, allowing to sort them efficiently with a magnetic field[12].

Magnetophoresis microfluidic technique. In this example a continuous flow gravity-driven microfluidic system is proposed for separation of WBCs and deoxygenated RBCs that uses an array of soft-magnetic elements which are magnetized by a bias field. In this model WBCs behave as diamagnetic micro-particles and deoxygenated RBCs are paramagnetic. Therefore, they move in opposite directions perpendicular to primary flow. From Furlani EP. J Phys D Appl Phys 2007.

10. Aqueous two-phase systems (ATPS) for cell separation and sorting

This technique is based on the differential affinity of cells and particles for either of two immiscible polymers (usually polyethylene glycol (PEG) or dextran) or their interface. Separation criteria include surface properties and net charge [13].

Schematic illustration of leukocyte separation based on microfluidic aqueous two-phase system (ATPS). In this example, whole blood diluted in PEG is exposed to a PEG-Dex interface, represented by the dashed line. Due to differences in surface energies, the leukocytes prefer the interface while RBCs migrate into the Dex region. From SooHoo et al. Biomed microdevices 2009.

11. Acoustophoresis cell separation and sorting technique

Acoustic cell separation and sorting techniques rely on the fact that cells and particles suspended in fluid experience an acoustic radiation force when they are exposed to ultrasound. Separation of particles utilizing this force can be achieved by generating a standing wave over the cross section of a microfluidic channel.

In this example configuration, while the fluid flow carries particles through the channel, a radiation force pushes them towards either the pressure nodes or the pressure antinodes of the standing wave [14] [15].

Acoustic separation. The acoustic radiation force may be manipulated for density-based, equilibrium separation (a, b) From Laurell et al. Chem Soc Rev 2007. or size-based kinetic separation (c). From Petersson et al. Anal Chem 2007.

12. Dielectrophoresis (DEP) cell separation and sorting technique

Dielectrophoresis (DEP) cell separation and sorting technique relies on the principle that when polarizable molecules such as large biomolecules and cells are placed in a non-uniform electric field, the field can impart a net force on the particle due to an induced or permanent dipole. This force does not require the particle to be charged. All particles exhibit dielectrophoretic activity in the presence of electric fields. However, the strength of the force strongly depends on the medium and particles electrical properties, on the particles’ shape and size, as well as on the frequency of the electric field. Consequently, fields of a particular frequency can manipulate particles with great selectivity.

DEP has been applied in a number of systems based on selective particle trapping and elution or deflection in continuous flow.[16]

Dielectrophoretic (DEP) separation can be a) positive (pDEP) or b) negative (nDEP) which affects where the cells are positioned within a field. c) DEP has been utilized in microfluidic systems in a variety of arrangements, some of which are depicted here. From Gossett et al. Anal Bioanal Chem 2010.

References

For more reviews about microfluidics, please visit our other reviews here: «Microfluidics reviews». The photos in this article come from the Elveflow® data bank, Wikipedia or elsewhere if precised.